$Jump to content
FlameWar
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Don_Dickle to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • 8M
Why does it seem the world is all of a sudden concerned about sexual orientation? Especially America. Did I miss how far we came as a society to see it take a 40 year step backwards?
message-square
332
fedilink
375
message-square
Why does it seem the world is all of a sudden concerned about sexual orientation? Especially America. Did I miss how far we came as a society to see it take a 40 year step backwards?
Don_Dickle to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • 8M
message-square
332
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • @jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -3•8M

    Family sizes are down, birth rates are now 1 per family, maybe 2 children.

    This is due to many reasons but mostly

    • Hormonal birth control
    • Women entering the mainstream labor pool

    Basically, there are better things for women to do then just have kids. This has a been a huge force multiplier for the economy

    However, this means that family lines, genetic lineage, family names, dynasties… All rests on the shoulders of a single child. That’s a lot of pressure.

    When you had 10 children, and one or two were “special”, it may have caused some drama but the lineage was still being secured by the other 8.

    When there is only one child who then chooses a alternative life style that does not reproduce that means the END of a genetic line, the end of a name, the end of a dynasty, the end of a family. These things are hugely important to people.

    I think people are more angry about sexual choices now, because they’re more important, because people have less children.

    • socsa
      link
      fedilink
      4•8M

      END of a genetic line, the end of a name, the end of a dynasty, the end of a family. These things are hugely important to people.

      Ohhh noo…

      Anyway.

    • TerkErJerbs
      link
      fedilink
      3•8M

      Do your research. Birth rate declines as cultural stability and wealth increase. Period.

      • @jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1•8M

        Birth rate declines as cultural stability and wealth increase. Period.

        Does this mean that birth control doesn’t prevent teenage pregnancy?

        Birth Control for Economic Development: Reducing human fertility can raise per capita income in less-developed countries.

Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
!asklemmy@lemmy.ml
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !asklemmy@lemmy.ml

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

  • !lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
  • !fediverse@lemmy.ml
  • !selfhosted@lemmy.world

Looking for a community?

  • Lemmyverse: community search
  • sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
  • !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

  • 207 users / day
  • 907 users / week
  • 2.59K users / month
  • 8.52K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 6.22K Posts
  • 284K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Evan
  • mekhos
  • tmpod
  • OrangeSlice
  • BE: 0.18.0
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • Join Lemmy