cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/54239937

During the Great Depression, when banks foreclosed on farms, neighbors often showed up at the auctions together.

They’d bid only a few cents, and return the land to the family that lost it. Sometimes a noose hung nearby as a warning to outsiders not to profit from someone else’s ruin.

It was rough, but it worked, communities protected each other when the system wouldn’t.

If a collapse like that happened today, do you think people would still stand together or has that kind of solidarity disappeared? Could it happen again?

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      That mostly has to do with the end of WWI and the reparations they had to pay. It happened near the same time, but not really related.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        That isn’t true. France, for example, had to pay a larger indemnity after the Franco-Prussian war. It certainly didn’t help but blaming it all on a fairly standard post-war treaty is literally a relic of Nazi propaganda.

        These events are interconnected and pretending the Great Depression didn’t affect economies world wide is revisionist nonsense.

    • CybranM@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s also partly because they printed a ton of money for reparations for losing the first world war

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      A story my parents shared with me as a kid, allegedly from somewhere in family history was of an individual taking a wheelbarrow of cash to the store to buy a loaf of bread, heading inside and learning the price had further increased and upon returning outside finding the cash dumped in the street and the wheelbarrow gone since that was the (relative) valueble left unattended.