Seems very much like indoctrination to get kids to “fall in line” and enforced conformity, to try to remove independent thinking.

I’ve always hated the idea of that. What do you think about it?

  • Geodad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I think it is. It’s a capitalist attempt to break the spirit of the young and get people ready for having to wear uniforms for work.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    No. The uniformity somewhat eliminates kids being picked on for being poor and not having the best department store clothes. Children will always be little shits to each other but uniforms at least removes one reason.

  • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    For me, the uniform was liberating. People who wanted to bully me needed to find something more substantive than just my clothes. Bullies tend to be stupid, so this was hard for them.

    If your individuality is all tied up in your physical appearance, try to develop your mind a bit. I am nonconformist in a thousand ways, each of which is more important than how i dress.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      If your individuality is all tied up in your physical appearance, try to develop your mind a bit.

      Kind of condescending, no? Also, they’re kids. Teenagers especially are all about their phsyical appearance… and their minds are developing.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I always hated it growing up, too. My school didn’t even have a uniform, only a dress code, and I hated that, too.

    But my kids go to a school with a uniform, and now I can see the advantages:

    • this school subsidizes the uniforms heavily, even to the point of giving them away outright to students in need, so it represents a form of clothing that is affordable for all

    • kids can’t fight with parents about what they wear to school, because it’s predetermined

    • every kid wears the same thing, which helps smooth out class-indicators: kids don’t get bullied for wearing hand-me-downs or unfashionable clothes because everyone wears the same thing

    • makes it very easy to determine who is supposed to be on campus and who is not; similarly, since the school has a big emphasis on outside-the-classroom learning, makes it very easy to identify students out on fieldwork

    • saves me money since the uniforms are unisex and my son can wear the hand-me-downs of his older sisters

    And to address your criticism: Yes, uniforms tend to promote group cohesion but that’s not always a bad thing. It encourages collaboration over competition, for example.

    • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      3 days ago

      Point 3 has always been a great equaliser. I grew up in a household that was tight for money, and I never felt that my school wear defined my “class”, quite the opposite.

      Now I’m older and am in a comparatively fortunate position financially, I’m happy to kit out my kids in a uniform. I don’t really want them flashing brand names or in an arms race to look the most fashionable, and I don’t want the less fortunate folk in the class to feel left behind.

      If a uniform is plain and inexpensive, I think the positives outweigh the negatives.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        As a parent of 2 kids under 10, at this age they don’t care about brands. The school uniforms are much more expensive than any t shirts or shorts or track pants from Kmart or bigW (Aussie retailers). Poorer kids still get hand me downs and second hand, whereas richer kids get brand new. Most kids are only-child these days, so the concept of hand me downs is less prevalent within a family.

        For teens, I can understand that point, but for teens I think self expression and exploring identity are key parts of growing up.

        • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          My oldest is a senior in highschool. From what I have observed, appearance – especially for teenage girls – is less about self expression and more about seeking approval from other girls. Clothing is entirely a status symbol.

          There’s often a few girls who are the “trend setters”, a much larger group of “followers” that basically look like carbon copies of one another, and yet another group that doesn’t follow the latest “trend” because they either can’t afford to or (much less often) don’t care.

          My daughter is obsessed with looks, as are most of her peers. Trying desperately to fit in because she’s not yet mature enough to realize that it doesn’t matter if all the other girls “like” her. It only really matters if she likes herself.

          I’ve told her, only half joking, that she will know a guy is good boyfriend material when he asks her which books she’s read lately.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          I guess it depends on the strictness of a dress code but theres usually ways to express and explore even with a set clothing expectation.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      About the class indicators thing: don’t people find a way around that by wearing expensive watches, jewelry or accessories?

      Usually people find a way to value signal imho.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    In my experience it seemed like uniforms were kinda another grift. You gotta buy everything just so from this specific place and you might never wear any of it again afterwards. I also got in trouble fairly frequently for accidentally having some part of my uniform out of order, which had more to do with forgetfulness or neurodivergence than anything.

    At the same time, I didn’t really feel like it interfered with my ability to think critically or independently, but that might just be me. I was always weird enough that anyone who would have bullied me over clothes would’ve bullied me over other stuff, and my head was in the clouds anyway so I hardly noticed what I was wearing.

    If anything, perhaps things like that biased my thinking in a libertarian direction, out of rebellion. It’s very easy to think that way when you’re young, and tired of parents and teachers telling you what to do.

    My mind works differently from most people’s and my experiences may be atypical. But when I googled for studies I found mixed results, it doesn’t appear that there are conclusive results showing a correlation between uniforms and academic performance.

    In any case, I think it’s that big of a deal. It is messed up, generally speaking, how little control kids have over their lives in the US and how people’s intrensic motivation is often killed off and they’re pushed around by extrensic motivators, rather than cooperating with what they actually want. I would say that uniforms can potentially contribute to that larger problem.

    • Funny enough, my US schools didn’t regulate shoes, so kids would just get thousand-dollar designer shoes and “show off” anyways. Also, backpacks are not regulated. You could get bullied if your shoes or backback looks “cheap”.

      Also, the Android vs iPhone thing.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    I loved school uniforms as a deeply autistic young man who really, REALLY struggled with all the silent peer pressures of fashion.

    There was an outfit I could wear without half a thought every day and no one cared.

  • missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    There are valid arguments for and against, but I really don’t think the word ‘authoritarianism’ is at all applicable here.

    • 鳳凰院 凶真 (Hououin Kyouma)@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Definitely applicable.

      Entire atmosphere feels a lot more weirder because everyone is forced to wear the same thing. Reminds me of when I was in China, where they forced little kids to wear the little red scarf, which symbolized communism.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        In your example it can be. But if no nationalistic rationale is behind the uniforms that are worn than it’s not authoritarian.

        So it can be but it’s not a given.

      • Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think is preparation for a white collar job. Everyone in the office usually use a uniform and there is nothing wrong with that. I feel like it is an exaggeration

          • Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            So you want everyone in society to be rogue and fuck the system that keeps things moving? I will never understand this mindset dude.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              “If we don’t force everyone to wear the same clothes the fabric of society will collapse!”

              Is that what you’re saying?

              • blarghly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                Tbf, it is about as valid as saying school uniforms are part of a plot to make us all slaves.

                • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  It really isn’t. You don’t think our near total control of the ability of children to make decisions about their lives has any effect on how they behave when they get older? Nor that this enforced system of obedience has intended consequences on those children when they become adults?

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I absolutely do, within reason and within legal limits, school kids should be able to wear whatever they want as it’s a big part of their self expression.

    Also, for things like art class, which can and will get very messy, very fast, especially with younger kids, school uniforms are just flat-out impractical vs. wearing old clothes you don’t care about, eg. for clay day or for paper mache day or anything else like that, although ideally for stuff like this, you’d provide some old slightly oversized shirts to begin with that can be smudged with paint or clay or whatever without fear, effectively acting as smocks.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    School uniforms level the outward socioeconomic presentation of students.

    If it weren’t school uniforms, then the oppositional-defiant disorder would present in some students another way. Not statistically relevant.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re about training children to comform and obbey arbitrary rules created by people in position of authority and to value impression more than behaviour.

    Of the countries I lived in, Britain was the one that had most of this shit and was also the one with the strongest “know your place” and “keep up appearences” mindsets of them all, especially amongst the middle and upper classes which were the ones were this shit was more common (there was a time of working class cultural significance during the 70s and 80s, which were a veritable explosion of creativity with movements like “punk”, but the social mobility and freedom that created it were crushed in the meanwhile, so working class kids can’t make it in the Arts anymore and that whole class is back at being culturally irrelevant outside fighting each other after football games).

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    In elementary school we had a cheap (literally cheap, 5 euro) uniform that covered everything so it would protect the underneath clothes from inks, foods, spills. Also it didn’t matter if someone wore some expensive clothes as they were covered.

    I noticed immediately from the first days in high school how something like that would have been useful as bullies would pick anyone about their clothing appearance. So there was an “unofficial” uniform, if you didn’t wear a brand name sweater then you were a loser to bully.

    Now, I saw the elite schools uniform, expensive shirt under an expensive cardigan and a tie… that is ridiculous and I feel a way to take more money from the rich families as the expensive uniform can be bought only from them and need to purchase multiple sets to wear over a week

  • Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s only authoritarian if the teachers / administration also wear a similar uniform, but slightly different to denote rank.

    Otherwise, it’s actually accidentally kind of socialistic, in that the divisions of class between your peers becomes less obvious, and there’s more cohesion with your fellow students versus those in authority. It’s easier for the students to rally together against something when they’re all wearing the same thing.

    Otherwise, it’s actually beneficial to authoritarians to have no dress code, because student cliques would strengthen, and infighting would be more common.

    For the USA, think about how both major parties use color to help separate people. If the colors of Democrats and Republicans were the same though, the division would be weaker.

    Uniforms have historically been used to unify groups rather than to control them.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Socialism isn’t the opposite of authoritarian. It’s always authoritarian to mandate uniforms, it has benefits as you and others have outlined but you are stripping people of their individuality and mandating what people can do that’s classic authoritarianism

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think there’s a line where mandates are authoritarian and where they aren’t, and it comes down the house beneficial for society or a group it is, but in particular also how exclusionary it is. Your view on determining it by face value is too simple for this.

        For example, if you mandate only Hispanic kids to wear uniforms, by your logic, that is more moral and less authoritarian because less students are being made to wear a uniform as opposed to all of them.

        Yet, it’s obvious that is not the case, despite fitting into your statement.

        Likewise, individualism has limits before it’s simply chaos too, and therefore should also be looked as to what point it instead brings harm. People here have, for example, listed many reasons not having a uniform code can be detrimental as well (wealth class divisions, strengthening of cliques, weakening of the student body’s efforts against things an administration will do).

        Not to mention, even in your call for a lack of uniforms, you are still technically imposing mandates: not only against those who do wish to have them, but likely against what people want to actually wear. I doubt you want students going in boxers or bikinis for example.

        And lastly, I’d like to mention that socialism is counter to authoritarianism. Authoritarianism might use some socialist aspects sometimes, but socialism itself isn’t in the same spectrum as authoritarianism.

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Mandates are authoritarian it is a governing body putting its authority on to you. It’s the literal definition here is a dictionary definition if it helps

          It’s also authoritarian to mandate don’t commit murder or don’t steal.

          This is a mandate from a governing body that strips away freedoms that previously existed. No idea where this idea of morality is coming from but it sounds like you might be mixing up fascism with authoritarianism. Fascism is an extreme form of authoritarianism with a heavy right wing influence as well.

          I am not calling for a lack of uniforms

          Socialism has a state which makes mandates upon those it has power over again text book authoritarianism but THAT DOESNT MEAN ITS BAD

          I am not saying all authority is bad as it is needed but if you make a sliding scale of how much authority a governing body has and you take a neutral scenario like a school and you add a mandate that forces students to follow a specific dress code that’s a sliding of the scale to auth and away from anarchy

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      divisions of class between your peers becomes less obvious

      Nope! Kids will always find ways around that.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think all schools in Brazil have uniform, even private ones. No such thing as “physical education uniform”, tho, you sweat on the same shirt you stay in class, so everyone is kind of forced to have 5 fucking uniform shirts and 2-3 pairs of pants and shorts, which makes it feel more like free money extortion rather than anything else.

    I don’t know enough about school history in my country to really tell whether this is some form of authoritarian bullshit or not, since there was some sort of education reform during the dictatorship (1964-1985) which led to a significant increase in private schools since, as “public school” became synonymous with “shit education”, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it originated from that line of thought. I mean, schools here operate on assembly line logic, so uniforms make perfect sense.

  • abc@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 days ago

    I suppose it probably seems strange to an outsider but in a country where it’s the norm for every school, it didn’t feel like that to me at all. I see it more as an equaliser? In a way I also kind of miss not having to decide what to wear every day.

    Honestly, my main concern about school uniforms is that I think they ought to be standardised and subsidised, because the expense can sometimes be a problem.

    • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Counterpoint: Americans would say the same - “I suppose it probably seems strange to an outsider but in a country where it’s the norm for every school, it didn’t feel like that to me at all.” - about pledging their undying loyalty every morning to the flag on the wall of every single classroom starting at the age of 6.

      Not to say that it’s the same thing at all, indoctrination on that scale is completely different from a freaking school uniform, but the base is the same - it doesn’t seem weird because it’s what you were told was normal.

      As an adult, I can see some good arguments for uniforms in this thread, but as a kid, I stopped saying the Pledge of Allegiance in middle school and swore that nobody could make me wear a tie like my dad had to for school. One of the big things that bothered me about school dress codes as I got older was the inherent misogyny on display. Some rules from my high school dress code, for example:

      During Spring/Summer, boys may wear t-shirts and shorts. Girls must wear pants or skirts. Skirts must be below the knee. Girls are allowed to wear t-shirts, but only if the sleeves are at least 4 inches long and must be a unisex crew neck shirt. Shirts with a v neck or that show the collarbone are too revealing and are not allowed.

      Also in the US is the issue that school uniforms are universally a private school thing, and so create a divide of elitism as a clear signal of those whose parents are wealthy enough to send their kids to a private school vs kids who go to public schools. Those divides start at home, though, and I don’t know how much a school uniform does to deprogram that kind of rhetoric from your parents and their friends.

        • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          This makes sense as I was in school before 2010, so my experience would’ve been from before more schools started adopting them. And my dad would’ve probably been in school in the 50s, so when he was wearing a school uniform with a tie everyday, it was absolutely a rich private school thing.

      • binarytobis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Americans would say the same … about pledging their undying loyalty every morning to the flag on the wall of every single classroom starting at the age of 6.

        Except they don’t. I and everyone I’ve ever discussed it with think it’s weird as hell.

        • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I don’t either, I think it’s super weird and creepy, but most people that I’ve talked to about it have never even thought about it before, and the people around my parents’ age consider it “patriotic.”