Which video?
I don’t remember which video it was, I’d have to go find it. At the end he sets up a ‘science experiment’ to show that wet wipes are flushable, unlike what everyone says. And the way he ‘proves’ it is clearly a terrible way to prove it, but if you aren’t thinking about it you’ll agree. I’ll try to find the video.
K
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/5zI9sG3pjVU?t=983
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Thanks for sharing that. I’ll agree it’s pretty dubious, but not enough to stop me enjoying their other content. But I have a pretty high skeptic quotient for everything online to begin with so, a little light shilling isn’t enough to turn me off of a channel that’s otherwise entertaining and often thought-provoking.
That “experiment” definitely deserves the mythbusters treatment, though. Even if that brand breaks into pieces faster, that doesn’t account for total breakdown or even what happens to its individual fibers after flushing. More data needed.
There was this one from a couple years ago that was about self-driving cars and also sponsored by Waymo. Tom Nicholas made a video which IMO does a good job of covering the problems with that video, and the broader implications of this kind of content on YouTube.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/yjztvddhZmI?si=qTMNmu-xRVJgDtYP
https://piped.video/CM0aohBfUTc?si=b_gMIeFxza7fOEBD
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
here’s the video. https://youtu.be/5zI9sG3pjVU?t=983
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/5zI9sG3pjVU?t=983
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
found it. https://youtu.be/5zI9sG3pjVU?t=983
there’s even people in the comments that don’t realize the experiment was bad science and think that maybe these wipes are ‘different’
more people actually saying they’re going to switch to flushable wipes.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/5zI9sG3pjVU?t=983
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Thanks for the answers! I had a bad taste in my mouth after his dandruff video which felt very corporate but I gave him the benefit of the doubt assuming that the science was solid. I guess my gut instinct was right.
I still think a lot of his videos are good, it’s just sad that the obviously sponsored ones are low quality. I’ll check out the links and response video someone else posted and keep being skeptical.
Damn, really? His concrete video was pretty interesting
I kinda slowed down on his videos since that Tom Nicolas video, but I watched his video from a few days ago about blimps because blimps are cool. But it just seemed like a corporate ad. The amount of the video that’s renders of products vs actual products is pretty bad.
It didn’t feel like a science video about blimps, it felt like half blimp startup ad, half simple blimp explanation. I don’t know, it just felt a little devoid of depth.
I would really like a channel that covers start-ups well, like explaining their idea and what they hope to accomplish then going into some of the challenges they face.
Far too many seem to be nothing but reading the press release and the first couple of paragraphs of Wikipedia.
deleted by creator
All of them.
There are a lot of smaller channels that are just people who are really good at something showing off what they do. It’s pretty amazing.
Agreed. Niche channels that I watch (woodworking, ham radio, four wheeling vehicle build tips) are usually pretty good.
I was kind of addicted to pimple popping videos, mini terrarium and horse shoe ones are cool too.
Cow hoof shaving/popping. There are a few channels, but my favorite is “Nate the Hoof Guy,” he’s from Wisconsin and he just travels around to different games as a cow vet and helps trim their hooves. Sometimes it can get disgusting, but it’s also fascinating to watch, and he’s really gentle and loving with all the animals.
This was a guilty pleasure of mine as well for a long time but it started making my feed too fucking weird to the point where I was nervous about even loading YouTube in front of other people.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
How so? I usually find their content pretty interesting
Often sponsored by organizations who would support the narratives their videos paint.
Often is too harsh a term, but that bioweapons video is 100% sus. It got worse when someone pointed out the video has no birds. It’s as if they quietly aknowledged something stinked with it.
100% this. He’s an influencer for hire.
Kurtuzeg. And alot of the “science” channels. They are so full of shit sometimes.
Their videos about the immune system are really good and educational (according to me, who has no idea if they’re just making shit up). But pretty much everything else they make is just pop science.
I agree. Like most science channels, they’re really good when they stick to pure science.
The issues usually occur when they decide to weigh in on a social or policy issue that they’re not qualified to talk about. Kurtzgesagt’s blunders all seem to be related to climate policy videos and their wishful thinking regarding Hail Mary technologies saving us.
For other readers, my bias is generally pro kurtzgesagt, I have several of their posters on my wall. Their social policy videos have just been really rubbing me the wrong way.
deleted by creator
Great video though.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/-XNDM4eAn1U?si=yh5DcnvVnLUYpmJc
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Sabine has been posting a lot of cringe lately. Such a bummer when a physicist decides to go down the 2009 history channel swerving out of their lane career path.
How does he fuck up people’s lives?
Yeah I want to know as well. His content isn’t exactly my cup of tea and can feel dystopia, but my dude flies around the world giving away free surgery to people and shit, and he promotes charities and foundations and actually moves people to donate to them. His thumbnails are creepy as shit, and his content feels like it was made to be cut up into a bunch of 6 second tiktok videos, but I don’t really see a dark side here.
I’m no Mr beast fan, but the dystopia you feel isn’t his fault. It’s the fault of our society. It’s the fact that some people have to rely on a clickbait youtubers generosity to have vision surgery, instead of it being freely available. It’s the fact that inequality is so rampant and ever growing due to our infinite capacity for greed.
Is all of them a valid answer?
No. There are plenty of YouTubers who make excellent content but are struggling to get views, hardly fits the definition of overrated. Just because they chose YouTube as a platform doesn’t automatically invalidate their work. Besides, which other platform do you want them to go to?
I find that the majority of the “Big Youtubers” seem to be very overrated. I never got super big into Pewdiepie as a kid, and trying to get into his content during the 100 mil craze made me wonder how he gained such a following (not dissing you if you do enjoy his content, but not my cup of tea).
On the flip side, i really enjoy slimecicles videos. Watching him is like eating a bowl of chicken soup.
most Poketubers
there’s this weird conundrum where a lot of Pokemon fans are older, mostly in their 20s, but the big name Poketubers almost universally aim for kids as their prime demographic
like that’s fine and all, but why are you aiming for kids when you’re playing a Professor Oak challenge, or something stupid hardcore? show the kids the shiny Rayquaza, show me your 900+ hour save file
also the ones that aren’t aimed at kids are usually pretty low quality, sorry Johnstone, sorry Bird Keeper Toby, sorry Absol Plays Pokemon
Vox, ig. Their videos are the video essay equivalent of a forgettable action flick.
Mr Beast - all his videos look and feel the same. And there’s nothing new that you learn from them.
Real Engineering
Some really uncritical videos about “pretty out there” startups. It’s basically a PR channel.
Same with Undecided. Dude it’s basically just a shill for random startups. He’s basically just Popular Science magazine, the YouTube channel.
Practical engineering is much better imo
Another one I’d mention is Rooster Teeth (the whole gang). I watched some of their “shenanigans” videos and they were just destroying office furniture, doing shitty pranks and in general being man-childs.
I just thought all the mess they left behind for everyone not on camera and what a shitshow it must be for the production crew to work with a bunch of internet mini-celebrities. They were basically the OG streaming mansion.
Fast forward a few years and you hear all these allegations of terrible work conditions. Go figure.
Stopped watching after the “I understand where racists are coming from” podcast bit
