any android apps that already can do that?

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    What useful information are you needing here that you don’t get from listening?

    Is your decision to listen to a song influenced by an AI purity test?

    “This sounds like derivative crap but it’s not AI so I guess I’ll listen to it”?

    “I enjoy this song! But it has 62% AI so no actually I hate it now”?

    • ¯\_(⊙︿⊙)_/¯@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      thanks for the teenage ideas. but normal humans beings have a consciousness. lookt it up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness

      so if the song is by a pedo or some asshole stealing the ideas from others I am sure you wouldnt want to listen to it? do you want to listen to music made by pedophiles? or by greedy corpos? or to AI shit? now tell me about your consciousness. :-)

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I’d wager it’s a reaction to Spotify “sneaking” AI slop into long background listening sessions (to reduce their licensing costs).

      That being said, I think a much easier solution is “don’t use Spotify”

    • ¯\_(⊙︿⊙)_/¯@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      so you are suggesting to shazam the artist and then what? then dissect the track for AI shit? useless.

      the use case is to hear a song and just be able to flag it for AI or not. nobody likes slop. AI image detection works. so why not slop detection for music. i mean sure, it will tell spotify is ripping you off.

  • jacksilver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s not really possible, especially given that most music is touched up post production to begin with (so isn’t “natural” anyways).

    Much like detecting LLMs or AI photos/videos it’s mostly heuristics and so it can only give you a probability something was AI generated. Even worse, any improvement on detection can be used to improve the models that make the content.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    I mean, there are apps that can detect Auto-Tune, I expect there will be apps to detect AI. Maybe not YET, but eventually.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I don’t think it’s easy to do. Given how unreliable “AI detectors” are in general.

    Also, why? Music is something very sensitive driven. If you like it you like if you don’t you don’t, I don’t think a quantitative measure on how a song is made is a reasonable approach to distinguish which songs you like and which song you don’t.

    I can just imagine:

    • Do you like this song?

    • I don’t know yet. (Pulls phone out to measure AIness of the song) No I don’t like it.

    • ¯\_(⊙︿⊙)_/¯@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      thanks for the reply. your idea is naive though because music is more than just the sum of its notes. there is background to it. wanna listen to some Michael PEDO Jackson? Hope not. Still have your diddy playlist? so ofcourse NOBODY should ever listen to AI but the lazy fucks most of humans are they’ll prefer the dopamin instead of using their brain.