We’re a small tight knit community. We see the same names everywhere. I’m sure many of you have been recognised by strangers before.

What is your claim to Lemmy fame.

(Question inspired by, https://lemmy.world/comment/19964547)

    • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      it’s funny because I know them because for a while they were systematically reposting everything from lemmy.ml communities to drive traffic away from “the tankies”. the first impression was of a total asshole

      • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t have no issues with that. Even ignoring that argument I prefer communities on smaller instances.

        Also remember you are the anarchist on .ml

        Damn my memory is good.

          • cm0002@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            for me the annoyance was that it was reposts from .ml to .world, not even uplifting smaller instances

            I actually did prioritize smaller instances first in most cases, but you’ll be happy to know thanks to their utter failure of dealing with JL I have entirely ceased posting to .world comms and recreating ones I run into that have no off-world off-ml alternative. @cm0002@lemmy.world is retired

            • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              ‘defending’ 🙄

              it’s that I find there’s more common ground with them than with the centrist extremists who get so worked up about their existence.

              Just yesterday I had one such person who started off calling me a tankie immediately pivot to ‘yeah well anarchism is bullshit too’

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Anarchism is anti-authoritarian, but that’s not really where it ends (to say it’s ‘all about that’ is a bit reductive). The point isn’t just to oppose authority, but to oppose hierarchy and domination. IE systems where authority becomes permanent, coercive, and self-justifying.

                  Anarchists aren’t going to oppose a doctor giving orders in the middle of surgery, or say that teachers have to get a vote from their class before being allowed to assign homework.

                  The problem is the structural authority where participation isn’t voluntary and the power can’t be revoked. This is why opposing the state, class society and capitalism is such a common refrain.

                  That’s why I said there’s common ground between marxists and anarchists. Both traditions start from the same diagnosis: the capitalist state is a machine of class domination. We both want to abolish exploitation and create a classless, stateless society. We can disagree about if some heirarchies can still be used temporarily for the purpose of liberation, however that’s a strategic debate with a shared revolutionary objective, not some huge moral divide.

                  At the end of the day, anarchists and marxists want the same thing: a society without without rulers, landlords, or bosses.

                  The disagreement is about how to get there, not about if people should be free at all.

                  • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    That’s fine, if most of the controversy surrounding tankies on here (and elsewhere) was just about “what state they’re trying to build”, but that’s not the case. Tankies defend genocide regimes, make false claims about suppressing uprisings because they were “fascist backed”, downplay atrocities committed by Mao and Stalin, support imperialist occupations of Ukraine and Taiwan, defend human rights abuses committed by the DPRK, and much much more. This is what makes up the bulk of controversy on tankies on the fediverse and outside it. Do you support these as well?

                    I ask this because I’m aware of anarchist’s readiness to denounce failings of past anarchist revolutions. Anarchists are more honest with their takes and readily say, “yeah’ I don’t support that. We can do better”; tankies do not have the same attitude.