(The war was over in Europe in May. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the following August.)

You told a guy who does childcare that women know they can wrap him round their finger, which iabsolutely is mistaking kindness for weakness, a very negative way of thinking, which is the toxic bit.

You don’t see at as toxic, but others do and you know it’s unpopular but you do it anyway, which is the no filter bit.

Unapologetic and unwilling to reconsider your position, you then start insulting people and being snarky, which is both toxic and lacking a filter.

I won’t be surprised if you double down and go more abusive and dismissive in response to what I’ve said because you clearly see no intrinsic merit whatsoever in kindness, so why would you hold back from the nastiest you could be?

Some of us learned social lessons at school (alongside academic content). Trump did neither, and thinks that playground bullying is strength. Be less Trumpy.

I’m with you there. Winking is very creepy indeed to me.

So. toxic, then, with no filter.

Hair clipper. Paid for itself in two uses. It’s been years.

Esperanto. Logical. Clear. Easy.

I didn’t make a claim either way. I just said the OP’s claim was unfounded, and it is unless and until they provide a study that backs it up.

You literally wrote that directly above

And top notch denial of axes to grind, positioning yourself as neutral whilst criticizing others.

You’re fucking lying that you don’t have a viewpoint when you’re up and down this thread demanding scientific studies from people who are sharing the experiences of themselves and people they know, and all of your “innocently neutral requests for scientific studies” are on one side of the debate and not the other.

It’s hypocritical, disingenuous, dismissive, dehumanizing and a logical fallacy that anyone with a different viewpoint to you has to have scientific studies backing up every point they make. It’s a shitty and vacuous debating technique.

Maybe, just maybe, the people in this thread who remember having a foreskin and don’t now (or whose friends have talked to them about that) have the most insight into what difference it makes to have a foreskin, and you could try respecting their opinion rather than demanding scientific proof that their experience is universal.

Love my penis, love my foreskin. All good.

Catholics not as keen on Paul as protestants.

Horrifying.

I dislike people who throw shade at others for not providing scientific studies whilst not providing any scientific evidence whatsoever to back up their own contrary view.

Excellent use of “show me the study” to discredit someone without providing your own study to back up your contrary point of view.

And top notch denial of axes to grind, positioning yourself as neutral whilst criticizing others.

Might not work in a court of law, but it’s strong internet debate fallacy usage.

And yet homicide is so much higher in the USA than other wealthy countries.

It means “if Allah wills it”, so similar to “God willing”.

Thanks.

“Content not viewable in your region”

Weird rant.

I guess it’s the opposite of “I won’t be a minute”, which means I’ll be fast.

Great flag, by the way.

Once I removed all the TTRJ type non-word allcaps crap from the dictionary, it became much more usable for me.

That’s surely accumulated wealth rather than the grey hairs?