• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle
  • From a chat standpoint, the two are near identical - yes - but Matrix lacks the “voice/video calls as persistent rooms” feature that Discord has. This was planned a while back, but has recently been pushed on the backburner[1] as they work on Element Call.

    Early on Matrix was sort of being built up as an IRC/Discord alternative, but recently they’ve pivoted more towards a WA/Telegram/Slack alternative as most of their financial support comes from European governments and companies looking for strong and secure internal communication solutions they can manage themselves.

    So, TL;DR you probably won’t see the exact Discord like features you want land in the spec any time soon as they’re not being funded.

    So that means, right now:

    • No persistent voice/video rooms (but they are on the roadmap!)
    • No push-to-talk or “game friendly” settings like voice auto-detection (also not really on the roadmap)

    Having said all that, Matrix is brilliant and I highly encourage people to check it out. I use a Matrix <-> Signal bridge for most of my comms with my friends, and we voice chat on Mumble. Not ideal, but you get to avoid Discord and you get a very similar experience! Bonus points for Mumble as it’s super lightweight.

    ~[1] It’s not really on the backburner so much as it’s something that will have to be worked on after the new VOIP stack - Element Call - is integrated in the wider Matrix ecosystem. There is an experimental “video rooms” feature, but that really isn’t the same as a native, persistent voice-only room.~


  • Derin@lemmy.beru.cotoFediverse@lemmy.worldMatrix 2.0 Is Here!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s the issues with XMPP’s spec: you don’t just use XMPP, you use XMPP + your favorite optional spec implementations.

    If your friends aren’t on the same server/client combo then you won’t be able to communicate with them (effectively).

    I loved XMPP, still do, but haven’t used it in years. If it were to get a single, matrix-style “spec release” (think an aggregation of existing features into one collection) that contains/requires a bunch of modern chat features I’ve come to expect from programs, then I could see it potentially having a resurgence.


  • Derin@lemmy.beru.cotoFediverse@lemmy.worldMatrix 2.0 Is Here!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m very excited for this! Granted, I do wish they’d stop “announcing” Matrix 2.0, but I think the release of SSS alone is reason enough for celebration.

    I have sync issues with even Slack or WhatsApp when I use an old device that hasn’t updated in a while - Matrix’s new sync scheme is genuinely fantastic and fixes all the issues my aging synapse server was having (4+ year server means those initial syncs on log-in could tak upwards of 10 minutes).

    Now I just want Element Call to work with my pre-existing accounts and then I’ll be ready for the next Matrix 2.0 announcement 😂








  • Nope, was added to dot Net after the fact. Normally you declare each type by hand, e.g.

    ArrayList<int> myCoolList = new ArrayList<int>();

    vs

    var myCoolList = new ArrayList<int>();

    The second example is why the keyword was added, but now imagine you have a function call returning an unknown type, and then things will start to get super funky.

    E.g.

    var myCoolBook = BuildBookData(input);

    …one step forward and then the same step back 😂 (disclaimer: I do actually like C#, though)