removed by mod
Every decreased market that ever existed should be sufficient. Fondue pots and miter boxes should get you there.
all the people involved in those markets were making decisions distinct from the people making decisions in the milk market. I dont think we can find anything so conclusive.
removed by mod
removed by mod
Here’s the test, everyone stops buying milk. Go.
removed by mod
removed by mod
I’m not going to believe something without evidence. your hand waiving is not evidence, and historical data about irrational actors is not predictive about the future of those same markets. it can’t be reliable evidence about the future in a separate market.
@remindme@mstdn.social 1 month
deleted by creator
that’s not a test. it’s a survey. I’m looking for a test for your theory. I think it is undisprovable.
removed by mod
The events were that demand decreased. Yes, demand could decrease in the milk market. Whether or not it will is a separate question. They are different in that the market decreased in the former and not the latter.
removed by mod
removed by mod
to be clear, you have made an assertion without evidence. a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. I don’t believe you, and no one should.
removed by mod
think people are going to produce rotting milk forever without a customer base for no reason.
I didn’t say that. you asserted the opposite, though, and I pointed out you can’t support your claim.
