Everyone knows the tale of Brand X getting bought out by some faceless global conglomerate and going to shit, but does the opposite ever happen?

    • aes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      didn’t they like… scrape everyone’s open source code for an ai and then gatekeep that shit to their own infra?

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Mixed feelings on this one; I think the jury is still out. I think I preferred GitHub being independent and focused on hosting source code and reviewing merge requests. But… I’m not sure if the product would’ve ended up any better without being under Microsoft.

      Microsoft lately seems to take pretty hands off approaches and follow the “don’t fix what isn’t broken” rule well, which seems to be working for them.

      • insomniac@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        They still behave like a monopoly. Microsoft owning everything is bad for tech even if they can throw money at it and make it “better.” I moved to codeberg.org and it’s been decent.

        • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, I don’t think anyone’s denying that MS is a shitty company; we’re just talking about companies that have either improved, or haven’t gotten significantly worse, because some other company bought them out.